Monthly Archives: April 2006

Part 3: Master/Slave and Peer-to-Peer

Following Jock Gill’s post at Greater Democracy, the answer is not just a paradigm shift, but a combination of the two – which allows for campaigns to coordinate the message with the distributed supporter infrastructure to improve efficiencies and results. Continue reading

Posted in eCampaigning | 1 Comment

Part 2: Greater Democracy – History of DemComm

Creating the DemComm group was a step in the right direction, but the challenges of the campaign priorities and operational efficiencies impacted the potential success of the team’s efforts. Continue reading

Posted in Campaign 2004 | 1 Comment

Part 1: Greater Democracy – History of Demtech

In answering Jock’s post on Greater Democracy, a minor history lesson of the Kerry Campaign is included to describe the community tech efforts attempted during the 2004 Presidential Election. Continue reading

Posted in Campaign 2004 | Comments Off on Part 1: Greater Democracy – History of Demtech

Movable Type 3.2 – Excellent

This weekend, I spent some time on two client’s blogs – and spent far too much time working with Movable Type 3.2. With this version, I can confidentally say that this product is incredibly powerful, easy to implement (once you have a handle on the MT APIs and CSS), and a joy to use. Continue reading

Posted in Political Tech | Tagged , | Comments Off on Movable Type 3.2 – Excellent

Labour, Lib Dems, Tories – how do they stack up?

Careful care and feeding of the list is the way to grow it for future volunteers and funds in the elections ahead. Continue reading

Posted in English eCampaigning | Comments Off on Labour, Lib Dems, Tories – how do they stack up?